The Market Center Blog

Contact Information:

Center for
Freedom and Prosperity
 P.O. Box 10882
Alexandria, Virginia

CF&P  Press Release, October 4, 2010

Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation

For Immediate Release
Monday, October 4, 2010

New CF&P Video Debunks Claim that Tax Hikes
are Required to Balance the Budget

(Washington, D.C., Monday, October 4, 2010) In a new video released today by the Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation (CF&P), Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute debunks the statist claim that the federal budget can only be balanced through massive tax hikes. Entitled "It's Simple to Balance the Budget Without Higher Taxes," this new CF&P video shows that balancing the budget is easily achievable with a modest amount of fiscal restraint - even if the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts are made permanent.

Using numbers from the Congressional Budget Office, the video shows that the budget can be balanced without any dramatic cuts (though it would be a good idea to sharply reduce the burden of government spending). All lawmakers need to do is limit spending growth and allow revenues to catch up. Under a hard spending freeze, for instance, the budget would be balanced by 2016. And if spending is limited to 2%, the budget would be balanced by 2020.

These scenarios even assume that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts are extended. The video concludes by exposing how politicians disguise federal spending growth and muddy the debate over the size of government. Projected spending increases are incorporated into a "baseline budget," which is then used to claim that merely reducing the rate of spending growth is a budget cut. Politicians then dishonestly claim that trillions in cuts are required to balance the budget, unless overtaxed voters hand over yet more of their hard-earned dollars to the federal government.

Links to the video: YouTube | Yahoo | Capitol Hub

"The right way to balance the budget is to limit the growth of government," said CF&P Foundation President Andrew Quinlan, who added that "higher taxes, by contrast, would be like trying to cure an alcoholic by giving him more to drink."

"The goal of fiscal policy should be small government and more freedom," said the video's narrator, Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute, "but this video shows that people who want a balanced budget should focus on the same thing - restraining the growth of government."

Executive Summary

    Politicians and interest groups claim higher taxes are necessary because it would be impossible to cut spending by enough to get rid of red ink. This Center for Freedom and Prosperity video shows that these assertions are nonsense. The budget can be balanced very quickly by simply limiting the annual growth of federal spending.

CF&P Foundation has also released more than three-dozen mini-documentaries since 2007. These videos include Tax Competition Primer, VAT-Hidden Tax, Global Flat Tax Revolution, Cutting the U.S. Corporate Income Tax, Promoting Prosperity, Obama's So-Called Stimulus, Obama's Deferral Proposal, Case Against Class-Warfare Tax Policy, President Obama's Dishonest Demagoguery on Tax Havens, Six Reasons Why the Capital Gains Tax Should Be Abolished, The Rahn Curve and the Growth-Maximizing Level of Government, a three part series on the Benefits of Tax Havens and a another three-part series on the Laffer Curve.

Web Links:



Capitol Hub


For additional comments:
Andrew Quinlan can be reached at 202-285-0244,
Dan Mitchell can be reached at 202-218-4615,





Return Home

[Home] [Issues] [Tax Competition] [European Union] [IRS NRA Reg] [Corporate Inversions] [QI] [UN Tax Grab] [CF&P Publications] [Press Releases] [E-Mail Updates] [Strategic Memos] [CF&P Foundation] [Foundation Studies] [Coalition for Tax Comp.] [Sign Up for Free Update] [CF&P At-A-Glance] [Contact CF&P] [Grassroots] [Get Involved] [Useful Links] [Search] [Contribute to CF&P]